Friday, August 30, 2013

The United States has decided to strike Syria for its chemical weapons used on it's own people. 

But is this really the truth?  Did Syria really use weapons on it's own people?

Does any of this make sense?

Only time will tell if these strikes are truly justified or simply another distraction by those in power to take attention away from all of the recent scandals of this administration.

 Chemical weapons in Syria: President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden: President Barack Obama stands with Vice President Joe Biden as he makes a statement about Syria in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, Saturday, Aug. 31.

Here's the latest news on this matter from msn.com news...

 "President Barack Obama said Saturday he has determined the U.S. should take military action against Syria. He will seek Congressional approval for the move.

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama says he has decided that the United States should take military action against Syria in response to a deadly chemical weapons attack.

But he says he will seek congressional authorization for the use of force.

He says congressional leadership plans to hold a debate and a vote as soon as Congress comes back in September."

What will happen if Obama gets congressional approval for this strike?  What are the consequences for striking Syria?

Could it lead to a wider world war and an eventual cutoff of our oil supply by other countries?

If oil is cutoff, could it lead to a limited food distribution by delivery trucks to our grocery stores?

Click here to learn more about the potential food crisis that could be the result of U.S. striking Syria...